After reading Fiedman's (2010) article, I both agree and disagree with several of the points he makes. First, I believe that his generalized comments on spending on war vs. spending on technology does not take into consideration that underdeveloped countries are now more capable than ever of posing a real threat to America and have in fact acted upon their hatred of our country. Some level of defense must be present against terrorism for the forseeable future. Will there come a day when it is not needed?
When it comes to our global competiveness, or lack thereof, I agree with Friedman that we cannot blame others or our own lack of resources. "They got rich digging inside themselves, unlocking their entrepreneurs, not digging for oil. They took responsibility. They got rich by asking: "How do I improve myself?" Not by declaring: "It's all somebody else's fault. Give me a handout." His quote regarding Taiwan must become again the spirit of Americans...willingness to roll up our sleeves and put in the hard work required for success.
Friedman did not provide many solutions for the problems our country faces. As educators we are the "front line" in developing the next generation with the mindset that can pull our country into greatness. Federal and state funding for education cannot continue being cut. Schools must play their part in bolstering science education. I believe private corporations should play a greater part in funding projects that benefit the greater good. Ultimately, fostering 21st century skills for innovation and STEM learning will ensure that America will again have a "sputnik".
Friedman, T. L. (2010, January 17). What’s our Sputnik? [Op-Ed]. The New York Times [Late Edition (East Coast)], p. WK.8.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI agree that we cannot continue to cut educational money. I feel like the teaching profession has really made steps backwards in the last few years and it is such a shame.
Lauren